Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 26.06.2025 15:23
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
JWST captures its most extreme gravitational lens ever - Big Think
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Trump is forcing this dirty, costly coal plant to stay open - The Washington Post
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Why the American Diet Is So Deadly? A Silent Killer Quietly Harming Millions - Indian Defence Review
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Thank you.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Is it ethical for same-sex couples to raise children?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
McDonald’s bringing it’s own version of iconic dessert to its McFlurry menu - MLive.com
Let’s just make it real clear:
Russia can stop this any time.
What’s next?
Reports: Bills RB James Cook ‘won’t be in Buffalo anytime soon’ - Buffalo Rumblings
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.